“BILLY CRESP” as LURKER wrote;
I just can’t keep ignoring Kowalski’s affront to real mentally disabled people who really have to deal with getting services from one’s government due to really needing them. She’s been implying lately that she is really impaired, partly by claiming that she needs government benefits and even a caregiver from the government to visit her, while what she writes about herself belies any such need. She was complaining that her caregiver hasn’t visited in a while and that she needs help applying for benefits. And now she claims she has a cleaner. I bet she doesn’t consider how ironic it is that she complains of living in a nanny state, while the goals she moans in favor of would leave real disabled autistics permanently beholden to and dependent on the same kind of nanny states she mentions. 

She knows it would appear extra brutal and mean if she railed against the need of cure of the truly disabled on the spectrum, if she was known to others as someone who isn’t impaired and is highly capable. I can still tell what a monster she is. If only she didn’t portray herself as a downtrodden and unfortunate member of some underclass, I wonder how she would bolster her credibility to talk so much about issues of mental disability, especially of her nonsensical incessant application of banal identity politics to autism. There isn’t much else to see in what she writes besides ableism this, ableist that, amongst other drivel she rants about. Why should she be considered as being serious with real disabilty issues while she rants on so much about unrelated issues? 

This liar even claimed that successful autistics are all throughout the spectrum, due to perseveration, as if nobody on the spectrum is deprived of the mental resources needed to produce success. From that, one would likely conclude that unsuccessful ones just need to keep at what they’re trying to do and to try harder, and that highly successful ones just succeeded due to persistence and not due to starting out with a high amount of potential which they didn’t work for. I think the ones with impairments have struggled enough. This woman is extremely disgusting to me. I hope there aren’t too many out there who are convinced by her distortions, as that would prevent true progress.

This entry just defies description. Cresp just doesn’t know what he’s talking about! Excuse me, fool, but as long as society tries to smash us to bits we need help to lead a gainful life!! SOCIETY is the problem, you idiot! Not the condition! What needs to be cured is society – it has to stop treating us like dirt. By calling for a cure – Cresp is doing exactly what society wants him to do. He shows his true colours with this post – he is too lazy to turn to his abilities and show the world what he CAN do! Instead he wants to push what he “can’t” (in reality won’t) do and expect sympathy.

Kowalski disgusts you, Cresp? You don’t know what disgust is. And you don’t know what Autism is either. Stop commenting on things that you know nothing about, go out and get a job. You’ve got no excuse. Society holds me and those of us on the Spectrum back. It doesn’t hold you back, because you are a part of it trying to slam us down with your Long Island Bull.

I held this waiting for the next main blog entry from Cresp – and there was nothing for a month. Even the comments had been quiet on all existing threads with the last being on September 30 (nutjobs), October 1 (phonies) and October 2 (Kowalski). Cresp was being lazy again! Finally he came up with one – so here’s this entry.

From the comments area of post number 3 and additions for post number 2, Cresp isn’t letting up with his hateful ignorance. I mean get a load of this for a start;

I was getting tired of his baseless ideas and obstruction of anything I said. There’s nothing to gain in talking to Phil.

Baseless, huh? I expose him as a liar and he tries to make such a stupid point as a defence. I obstructed his garbage because that’s what it is – garbage. If he feels he has nothing to gain then he refuses to learn.

I can’t stand how Wombles laughs off and dismisses criticism of her, while brushing anyone off that uses a reasonable argument. It seems nobody can count on talking about the issue with her without her just resorting to childish platitudes.

What you do expect when you behave like a spoilt brat?

John Best Junior ran in to the comments of post number 3, figuring that we’d learn something from being locked in a room with an LFA. Cresp leapt on board with that idea.

I’d like to see them endure just a few days being and living as the low functioning do.

We’d manage it, because we understand it. And we would learn how to help the low functioning more directly. Very useful. Jonathan Mitchell decided to support Lurker’s view.

Jake Crosby then came on and complained about the claim to “amazing capabilities”.

Jake, I still wonder what they really think sometimes. I think their version of things changes depending on whatever argument they try to lie about.

That’s YOU, Cresp!!

It seems like when they’re not worried about anyone revealing the problem of impairments, they’re so willing to glorify themselves through talking of their amazing capabilities while not talking of impairments which they don’t have, but when others are finding out the truth about the impairments on the spectrum, they pretend they also have to deal with them alongside their talents, as if the impairments are manageable.

They are – with appropriate assistance and treatment. And understanding.

This further proves what Cresp is all about. Wanting impairments to be put over as the whole issue with no positives at all and a need to be accepted. Putting the Advocacy movement as anti acceptance (which is what he is doing) is slander. This is the area that he is trying to ride the coat tails of – when he is NOT low functioning. He NOT impaired. He is lazy. He has many capabilities and he should be using them. The fact that he doesn’t is proof of his laziness.

I have never hidden the impairments of LFA’s. They are there. It’s a fact. Life depends on how you handle adversity. You either take it by the scruff of the neck and do the best you can (as I do) or you give up and let the adversity squash you under it’s thumb (like Cresp does).

“BILLY CRESP” as LURKER wrote;
{ME} is at it again contradicting things I say on the blog he uses to bash me, doing so using no sense at all. He tried to defend the conclusions made from the currently useless UK study I complained about, by saying that the autistics in institutions are a “rather large minority”, whatever the fuck that means. This creep is trying to pretend the ones living in those shitholes don’t count or don’t still exist in significant numbers. He likely hasn’t even considered that there could be ones who are homeless. He explains the study saying some shit about specialized employment programs and assimilation into society. 

Now this bastard has said that LFAs aren’t disabled, and that they’re only disabled if they choose to be!! Then he viciously attacked someone’s character, by giving an example of one he claims chose to be disabled. Then he went on with the usual inane bullshit that the impairment comes from society. How isn’t he contradicting himself when he says that society causes impairment but an LFA is disabled by choice? I wonder how one is to choose not to be disabled. How does one abide by that suck it up, work harder till you drop ideal? I wonder what he expects them to do and try to do. I wonder what pitfalls he would warn them about, considering he once said this: “I constantly find LF’s that try to operate like HF’s and fail badly – and gives us all a bad name in the process” This mook doesn’t know what he’s talking about. 

He’s clearly been following the tactics and explanations of the rest of the neurodiverse freaks, unlike when he used to say what he really thought. He continues to be extremely self-centered and self-loving, and seems to think everything revolves around him, and that he is the final authority on anything he wants to talk about. But Phil isn’t too popular with the other ND pushers, but it seems they keep him around to intimidate others and shout them down for going against ND. He’s been quoted by others on Aspies For Freedom as saying: “Why do you think she was booted from AFF – aside from being a SELF CONFESSED LFA! (who BTW are INHERENTLY not intelligent – unlike HFA and Aspergers!”

He caught a lot of flack on there for saying that, so then he on that forum defended what he said using his clear understanding that IQ is a sign of functioning level. He even said a particular person was LFA because he thought her contributions to the internet are “hollow and repetitive”. He was eventually banned from AFF. ND doesn’t consider what he says to be a problem enough for them to go against him and forgo using him for their dictatorial cause. Alongside that, the stronger neurodiverse influence over his disordered ideas, is obvious now as he still works with them. 

He still maintains his humungous ego through his ridiculous blogs that bash me and others when we make posts, along with his group of obscure assholes who back him up on his insults of others. I bet they’re sock puppets of his. He bans my IP from his website and if I try to go on there it says: “has been banned as it has been used by a person or persons who represent a threat to the mental health of the owner of this website” What a pretentious jerk off! Anyone who sticks to their disagreement with him to his face, is supposedly a threat to his precious vulnerable mental health, which needs delicate protection, as if this lunatic has any mental health!

Oh I knew it! The instant I start having a go at him, he has a good old fashioned whine like the coward that he is. And intentionally misrepresents me while he’s about it!

For a start, his reference to “LFAs aren’t disabled” intentionally left out an important adverb – “seriously”. I NEVER said LFA’s aren’t disabled at all. That’s a flagrant lie, and Cresp’s lazing reading all because he hates me so much due to the fact that I’ve exposed him for what he is. Lazy – and NOT disabled. His refusal to acknowledge society’s contribution to the problem is further evidence of this. Society causes meltdowns, and THAT is what worsens matters for everyone on the Spectrum.

For the record, Cresp made a comment that was an admission of his laziness – his criticism of the “suck it up, work harder till you drop” ideal. Work it out for yourselves, readers! That’s an admission that he is lazy!

He then decided to pick up two quotes that were specifically aimed at one person. Shelley/Droopy. She is the ONLY example of “LF’s that try to operate like HF’s and fail badly – and gives us all a bad name in the process” that I know of personally. I have heard of others, but they have been pulled into line thankfully. And for this very reason. And Cresp figures I don’t know what I’m talking about when he’s got absolutely no idea!

The second quote was also primarily about Droopy – although it was also a reference to the old issue within my own state government’s disability services area (which apparently has since changed thank goodness) with their refusal to assist those on the Spectrum who weren’t low functioning and the criteria actually included “inherently unintelligent”. It was a protest remark combined with the fury aimed squarely and singularly at Shelley.

I work with no one that Cresp is thinking of. He – like Best and the others – think that Neurodiversity is the name of a movement. It’s not. Neurodiversity is the description given to the different ways the human brain works from person to person. Whilst it’s true that some people don’t like my tactics, they also know that they can’t stop me. Not only that, they also know that I target the right people. If I went after the wrong person, they’ll tell me.

I have no sock puppets. I laugh about that now. It used to upset me, but I take that now as laughable. After all, they can’t prove it – and people like Craig/Scratcher (who helps look after the HARB) and Tex amongst others laugh as much as I do about it. Especially Tex, who was the one who finally convinced me not to get worked up over it. I can easily prove that I’m not online when they put their messages on if needed, and sometimes I’m not even home!

Finally, Cresp is a mental health threat to me because he interferes with my base routine. That’s why I have this blog. So I can upload it on my time and not his – instead of wasting time commenting on his stupid blog. I consider it my duty as a person on the Autistic Spectrum to run this fool out of the blog community. And all I have to do is tell the truth about this lazy fool who needs a good swift kick in the bum and a slap in the face for his persistent trolling and carrying on like he has something to contribute to the Autistic community. He doesn’t – pure and simple.

“BILLY CRESP” as LURKER wrote;
Sadderbutwisergirl has a new post up where she pretends that a diagnosis/label of aspergers is something that some autistics are just “dubbed” with, as if it has nothing to do with apparent level of disability and lack thereof. She also went on portraying the curing of those who are low-functioning as an extermination, typical of her hysteria where she likes to accuse anyone who favors cure of being a nazi. I think it’s interesting that she let it slip that she knows that there are varying degrees of disability within the spectrum. She then went on with a misleading bizarre interpretation of the curative approach to the problem, and then she throws in a quote from Orwell. Damn, I hate it when so many individuals make hackneyed references to Orwell to prop up reactionary ideals, and to belittle helpful progressive measures.

She deleted all of my comments on her post after a while. She accused me somewhere of having only skimmed over her post. She even refers to my commenting with my opinion as “derailing the conversation”, when conversation wasn’t even really happening anyway. She, like the others, wouldn’t mind having a dissent-free group think conversation, with nothing but pats on the back, and extra phony rhetoric in an echo chamber. Any talking to them that disagrees with them, is called trolling by them over and over. Then they come up with new slogans/phrases like “don’t feed the trolls” and “concern troll”. They often can’t come up with anything cogent to refute what’s been said to them, so their insults tell me that they’re just full of shit.

I wonder if that accusation of skimming is just another example of those on her side deeming anyone who doesn’t agree with what they say as having not listened to them, as if knowing what they say must lead one to agree with it as if it’s fact. I don’t like how she pretends to be some underdog prone to being mistreated, who so self-righteously knows so much better than others about how to handle these issues, sometimes with her black and white thinking, just because some entities have been assholes to her in the past. She is neither sad nor wise.

This post proves something that I have said before. Cresp doesn’t have a disability. He has distinct abilities. He just won’t use them, and instead he cheap shots SBWG – especially after she deletes his trolling. And it was trolling because all he wanted was attention for his deluded views. That’s why they were “off topic” because more and more people are realising that those who already know (like myself) are right about this idiot.

I don’t need to say anything else – except to remind Cresp that curing those on the Spectrum is the same is killing a culture. That’s EXACTLY what Hitler was trying to do with the Holocaust – kill a culture (the Jewish). So you can complain about the Nazi referencing all you want. It’s 100 percent accurate, and to say that it’s not is tantamount to being no better than the Vatican was towards the plight of the Jews at the time – something that they have not lived down to this day.

“BILLY CRESP” as LURKER wrote;
I saw a new post by abfh, where she claims that most autistic adults are employed, citing a recent UK study about autistic adults, which was discussed by Joseph. That study only included ones living in houses, not ones living in institutions. That is obvious from just looking at the title of the study. I wonder what excuse she has for omitting that important fact which shatters the validity of what she concluded from the study. I think she’s very comfortable with that lie, as it’s part of the recent tactic of the neurodiverse hysterics, to pretend and try to get people to believe that the low-functioning don’t really exist, by claiming they’re only a small minority of the spectrum, among other nonsense. Since they could not justify to enough people their anti-cure crusade to maintain the obvious wide disparities in ability within the spectrum, they now resort to deny reality even further through implying that almost nobody on the spectrum is impaired, like autism only concerns high-functioning poindexters.

I even saw someone basically say that the majority even of LFA aren’t very impaired. Corina commented on the blog that Phil Gluyas made to rebut and bash me, that it can’t be assumed that anyone labeled HFA is less disabled than someone labeled LFA, as she says she sees no evidence of that. She pretends to know so (beep!)ing much as she departs from common sense and common knowledge on autism. I wonder if she’d like to imply that she has more impairments than someone who is LFA. She also implies somewhere else that Aspergers makes up a very large part of the 1 in 100 prevalence statistic. She implies I’m full of shit by saying that all I know about autism is from unnamed internet sources, because I don’t specifically enumerate the various sources I’ve received information about autism from. I’d like to know where this phony bitch gets her information, and what autistics she chooses to interact with to base her claims on. The cruelty by which they deny what is going on is amazing, and they act like it’s a joke.

First off, Cresp makes a basic mistake by assuming that LFA’s are all seriously disabled – and by imputation that they are capable of nothing. That’s the basis of his attack on Corina, and like every other time he types anything – he’s wrong. LFA’s are only seriously disabled if they choose to be (case in point – Droopy). They are still capable of achieving despite the issues they do have, and this is something that Cresp denies. I back Corina up when she says Cresp has no sources outside of the Internet for his BS. Corina has sources, and she has every right to demand Cresp cough up his sources. He won’t because he knows they are well known to be unreliable. He’s too lazy to tell the difference.

If Corina implies that Cresp is full of cow manure, I actually say it. You’re full of cow manure, Cresp!

The impairment lies outside the body – as I said to Cresp many times (and he won’t listen). It’s society. THAT is the impairment. THAT is what causes the wide disparities Cresp is talking about.

As far as the study goes, it shows that things are improving when it comes to work. Specialising is making a comeback, something that I’ve always said was needed not just for those on the Spectrum – but for the workplace in general when it comes to quality of work. The statistics are relevant – and Cresp tries to fob it off because it doesn’t include those in institutions. He forgets that those in institutions nowadays represent a rather large minority – due to attempts to assimilate Autistics into society. Cresp is also not taking into account efforts to provide specialised employment programs – something non-existent in the United States by and large. It’s a clear case of cultural bigotry by Cresp.

It augers well for me if Australia has figures following those of the UK – if it wasn’t for that filthy CMO report.

There has been no fudging of numbers. Except this failed attempt to do it by Billy Cresp – the lazy twonk (apologies to David Andrews for the insult theft!) who should be out getting work himself instead of making stupid remarks like this.

Footnote – Crosby and Mitchell decided to spout their objections, and I commented that they should start living in the real world, although I qualified it in the case of Mitchell. Such is his educated hate for himself.

Blithering idiot.

On the “Phonies” thread, here is Cresp’s reply to my last comment there with quotes from me in italics;

“Equality is everyone being treated fairly and as human beings.”

That’s not enough for equality. What about equality in outcomes and in having wanted things to experience in life? What about equality in level of ability and capability?

“Your behaviour seeks to deny our efforts to be regarded as human beings.”

You don’t know what it is to be human! Stop expecting sympathy for the suffering of you and those like you, while you promote obliviousness about the suffering of those around you!

There is no equality in ability and capability you idiot, and there never will be! That’s the nature of the human race. Cresp clearly believes that anyone who is not equal in these factors has to be that way or they can never be equal. He has a warped view of what constitutes equality. His lies are falling apart around him. His refusal to acknowledge what being human is proves that beyond a shadow of a doubt. Neither I nor anyone else who believes in neurodiversity promotes obliviousness about any suffering. Cresp is doing that.

On the “Nutjobs” thread;

Phil, you really don’t make sense sometimes. I think what you say lacks context sometimes.

That’s his excuse now? Making things up to make up for his lazy thinking.

Phil, I don’t have legal recourse against a therapist in a broken and corrupt system. If I had recourse recognized by the state, I’d be doing something. I can’t help that I’m from a decaying country where standards aren’t well mandated.

Oh what rot! If he has a case he has a recourse. Cresp is making cowardly excuses and won’t fight because he’s lazy!

“You CAN perform basic tasks. If you couldn’t you wouldn’t even be on the Internet. That’s another lie exposed”

Not all basic tasks. I don’t know how to speak clearly all of the time, or to express my thoughts or answers in a comprehensible string of words all of the time. I can’t read body language well, especially gestures. I sometimes have difficulty understanding things and instructios others tell me. I have weak motor skills in some aspects. I can’t drive. I’m forgetful about some things.

The excuses continue. Look at the qualifiers all over this message (and I’ve underlined them). The fact that he CAN do some of everything proves that he is NOT as badly off as he thinks. He’s making excuses.

“Completely irrelevant.”

Ever heard of an analogy?

Ever heard of an irrelevant analogy?

“LOL! You bet it is. Another lie exposed.”

It kinda isn’t. You are not making any cogent points here.

Playing ignorance when I’ve exposed him. Way to debate again, idiot!

“I can’t leave, idiot! They have to change their tune and that’s what I’m doing! Hardly lazy! And I’ve already told you about the CMO! Ignoring information is lazy, and it also proves that you are willing to be so.”

I’ll stop ignoring your information when you stop ignoring mine.

Stop ignoring the reputation you have then and start working on it.

“Why would I screw with you if I find out you’re telling the truth?”

Because you don’t like me.

Oh sure – that’s a really good reason. NOT!

“Dangerous to everyone on the Autistic Spectrum, because you are a threat to the support structures that are needed for those who are left behind.”

What have you done to further any support structures?

Take a look at my contribution to the Coping with Autism section at the Autism Speaks Ning for a start. There was also my contribution to the Autism State Plan here in Victoria. And of course there’s the enquiry I’m trying to start.

“Your claim slanders the concept of neurodiversity and is another example of how dangerous you are.”

Don’t call it slander due to ND’s reluctance to admit what they’re really against. What about the inequality that exists due to the entrenched disparities between the low and high functioning?

See? Cresp just slandered the concept again. There is no reluctance. He made that up. The concept resolves the disparity. Cresp wants that disparity to stay so he has an excuse to be lazy. The minute that disparity disappears his enablement goes with it and he can’t be lazy anymore. That’s no one’s fault but Cresp’s – because he’s a liar and a coward.

After trying to gag Cresp on his own blog, it became clear that he would not listen. I mean get a load of this twaddle, which has now been removed from it’s original location – but preserved here.

My opening two responses on the blog represent my first comments on both threads. Here’s how the Nutjob thread panned out;

Phil, you tell the truth about almost nothing about me. Don’t bother saying those things about me since you basically are admitting that you’re slandering me because you don’t like what I say.

Prove that I can work and that I’m lazy. Why would I want to spend my time here arguing with lunatics like you, if I could have a job and a life along with it? What does it matter that I’m NT if I am when I’m so mentally impaired? I haven’t been on SSI or similar programs, and I wouldn’t bother trying to get such programs that I don’t want. The reasons I hang around the autistic “community” are unusual but it’s not to justify myself or whatever. I wonder how you’re protecting the community when you so self-righteously chastise nearly anyone involved who dare disagree with you.

What do you want me to do with my life and how, considering that I lack so much capability? What have you made out of your own situation that would prove that you are a responsible person? I wonder what you’re contributing that is so helpful.

All I needed to do was grab one quote – which I’ve bolded above – and then I added this;

There it is. That’s lazy. Why don’t you want them? Because they can’t help? BULLSHIT!! You don’t want help – because you are LAZY!!

You want me to stop? Prove that you aren’t lazy. Prove that you have a legit problem. Go to a psychiatrist and get a formal diagnosis.

Until then – I stand by what I said. You are NT. You are a liar and a cheat. The burden of proof is on you.

He then decided to take comments from me and take them to bits along with other nonsense. Here’s how the whole thing went down. His comments are in red with the quotes from me in italics. My comments are in blue. The italics again are quotes from him;

Phil, I don’t want to live off of government money. I probably would have a hassle trying to get it anyway and may end up being deemed ineligible for it. That doesn’t mean I’m not willing to go through hassles to get things I need, which I have been doing. I’m starting to get help now.

“Prove that you have a legit problem” In what way am I to do that? How have you proven the basis for your problematic situation? Last year, I went to a neurologist who wasn’t helpful and was dismissive of what I told him. Shortly after that, I went to a psychiatrist who hadn’t listened to enough details about me by the second appointment with him, and when I let him know that one of my goals was to find out what condition I had, he then said that in his opinion I had some condition.

I didn’t see him again till earlier this year when I gave him some forms to fill out for documentation of a diagnosis, so I can get into a vocational program. He initially didn’t fill them out completely and legibly, and when I first looked at them, I saw he had wrote in some diagnostic codes but I couldn’t tell all the numbers he wrote for it. I and the place I go to for the program have been talking with his office back and forth trying to get the information he was supposed to write down in the first place. I’m in the program now, but I’m not sure if they have all the requested information from him yet.

Considering that I was in special ed in 1st and 2nd grade and was in some speech class during those same years, that I was in remedial reading in 4th and 5th grade, that I’ve had below average scores on many standardized tests, and that I’ve been unable to do so many basic things throughout my nearly earliest and most recent years, what reasonable doubt is there that I have a “legit problem”?

That doesn’t mean I’m not willing to go through hassles to get things I need, which I have been doing. I’m starting to get help now.

Like opening this blog I suppose?

Come on, Cresp – let’s see something TANGIBLE! WHERE are you getting help? And for what?

In what way am I to do that?

Stop posting. Prove that you have trouble reading and writing. Right now you’re proving you can read and write perfectly well. Get a diagnosis as well. I’ve got one (and four confirmations). And I know what the basis is of my issues and I am fighting them – with more courage than you’re showing right now! For example;

Last year, I went to a neurologist who wasn’t helpful and was dismissive of what I told him.

So? That means either you don’t have a problem, or you go and get a second opinion!!

That last paragraph is a lie. Again – look at how you write and read. THAT is how I not only “doubt you have a legit problem”, I don’t believe it at all!

How could ND be on my side while their true ideas contradict the ideas of mine that matter a lot, and while if they get their way, awful conditions that I hate would persist?

If your ideas contradict that of Autistic Advocacy (not ND), then too bad. You aren’t one of us – and yet you’d try and stop us from getting what we need just because you don’t get what you want? What conditions do you hate? Equality I suppose?

Shut down this waste of a blog, and if you have a legit problem – go away and deal with it. Leave us alone.

Tangible?! Why don’t you show me something tangible to prove things about yourself? I’m getting help at a center that helps those with mental illnesses learn to get jobs, and I have applied for vocational disabilities services to get better help. I’m not sure what constitutes a formal diagnosis. The same psychiatrist who told me that in his opinion I had something put down a diagnosis on a form. I don’t have $250 an hour to throw around on psychiatrists and neurologists trying to find one who isn’t oblivious to my condition.

Prove that I have trouble reading and writing? How am I supposed to do that? I’m not proving I can read and write well. I have virtually unlimited time to do the reading and writing I do here, which I have to do carefully and slowly. When I read books, articles, etc., I can only do it slowly, I have poor comprehension, and I tend not to remember many of the things I read even if they’re familiar to me when I read it again. What was I in remedial reading for if I can read well? Why did I have low scores on standardized tests that involved reading and writing? How many of my impairments do I have to enumerate to make it undeniable that I am mentally weak?

“Again – look at how you write and read. THAT is how I not only “doubt you have a legit problem”, I don’t believe it at all!” All of the ND creeps are of way higher capability compared to me, so why don’t you complain to them when they imply they’re part of some disability community, or that they have some stake in disability issues, or even that they have mental impairments?

“And I know what the basis is of my issues and I am fighting them – with more courage than you’re showing right now!” What have you done about it that is so significant, considering the pointless stuff you’re still wrapped up in?

“That last paragraph is a lie.” How exactly was it a lie?
“and yet you’d try and stop us from getting what we need” Who am I trying to stop from getting what? Explain these accusations as you drop them. “What conditions do you hate? Equality I suppose?” Stop projecting. It’s just pathetic. I hate the conditions of large disparities of capability/aptitude and the inevitable dependence that results. Don’t pretend to be so clueless about me. I’m not shutting this down. I’m not going anywhere. I’m not leaving you vermin alone.

Cresp is the vermin here. That I have no doubt about.

I don’t have $250 an hour to throw around on psychiatrists and neurologists trying to find one who isn’t oblivious to my condition.

Then [beep!]ing get it you lazy sod!! IF there is really a problem that is!

Prove that I have trouble reading and writing? How am I supposed to do that? I’m not proving I can read and write well. I have virtually unlimited time to do the reading and writing I do here, which I have to do carefully and slowly.

The reason you have plenty of time is because you’re lazy. But I don’t believe you have plenty of time – if I am to believe you’re getting help. You’ve got a web of lies to untangle.

How many of my impairments do I have to enumerate to make it undeniable that I am mentally weak?

Get a diagnosis. It’s that simple.

All of the ND creeps are of way higher capability compared to me, so why don’t you complain to them when they imply they’re part of some disability community, or that they have some stake in disability issues, or even that they have mental impairments?

We are LABELLED disabled! We have to fight the definition of “normal” when there shouldn’t be one. Here you are pursuing the same label, when unlike us you don’t fit the bill.

What have you done about it that is so significant, considering the pointless stuff you’re still wrapped up in?

Are you calling pushing for an enquiry in our government pointless?

Who am I trying to stop from getting what?

Us from getting the support structures we need to overcome the labels society put on us. You being an NT and just lazy puts us in the same box when we don’t [beep!]ing deserve to be!!

I hate the conditions of large disparities of capability/aptitude and the inevitable dependence that results.

So? You do something about it! And don’t tell me you can’t! That’s proof of laziness.

Don’t pretend to be so clueless about me.

Don’t pretend to have problems. I have more of a clue about you than you’re willing to admit – and scares the [honk!] out of you.

I’m not shutting this down. I’m not going anywhere. I’m not leaving you vermin alone.

You will. You have to, if you are serious about dealing with these so called problems of yours – because you won’t have time.

And one more thing;

Why don’t you show me something tangible to prove things about yourself?

Such as? If you mean my diagnosis and the four confirmations, it’s impossible to upload multi page documents on my website without the appropriate software. If not then what the [beep!] are you talking about?

Yes I was angry and I still am at this dangerous loser. And on it went!

Get it? Where? I don’t have a damn job! Why don’t you put down your wrestling and football fantasy hobbies, and get a job, by doing whatever conciliatory things you have to to do so!?
“Are you calling pushing for an enquiry in our government pointless?” I’ll acknowledge the significance of what you’re doing when you acknowledge the same about me.
“You will. You have to, if you are serious about dealing with these so called problems of yours – because you won’t have time.” Really, then if you are dealing with the problems of your own making, then why do you have any time to do the things you do around here?

“The reason you have plenty of time is because you’re lazy. But I don’t believe you have plenty of time – if I am to believe you’re getting help. You’ve got a web of lies to untangle” You won’t acknowledge a damn thing I say as you can’t handle it or refute it. Stop changing the subject and making baseless points to attempt to undermine my explanations.

“Get a diagnosis. It’s that simple.” It’s not that simple. I don’t need nor can I rely on a pill pushing shrink who usually deals with lunatics and melancholy housewives, to determine I’m mentally impaired. And some of the therapists I’ve been to over the years didn’t deny the impairments I made known to them. I’m not really sure what constitutes a diagnosis.

“Us from getting the support structures we need to overcome the labels society put on us” How am I preventing that? Think of what you’re trying to prevent.
“So? You do something about it! And don’t tell me you can’t! “ I’m trying to stop the individuals who want to prevent things from being done about it. I speak in favor of increasing the clarity of the understanding of the conditions to be dealt with.

“Such as? If you mean my diagnosis and the four confirmations, it’s impossible to upload multi page documents on my website without the appropriate software.” I assume you’re telling the truth about things such as that, so why don’t you do the same regarding me?

Get it? Where? I don’t have a damn job!

From your government, idiot! They’ll have a subsidised service there somewhere!

Why don’t you put down your wrestling and football fantasy hobbies, and get a job, by doing whatever conciliatory things you have to to do so!?

“This person is not fit for appointment” (Commonwealth Medical Officer report 1997)

While that report remains on file, I can’t work! Simple! And NEVER EVER call what I do with the football and wrestling [beep!]ing hobbies! They are all that’s keeping me sane right now and don’t you [beep!]ing forget it!!

I’ll acknowledge the significance of what you’re doing when you acknowledge the same about me.

So where is the significant stuff you’re doing huh? Nowhere!

Really, then if you are dealing with the problems of your own making, then why do you have any time to do the things you do around here?

I make time because I consider you a threat to the truth. And the problems I have are NOT of my own making BTW!

You won’t acknowledge a damn thing I say as you can’t handle it or refute it. Stop changing the subject and making baseless points to attempt to undermine my explanations.

I’m not changing the subject. You won’t tell the truth and I’ll prove it with every example I can find. With you, that’s as easy as anything. I’ll refute it every time. I can’t help it if you won’t listen.

It’s not that simple. I don’t need nor can I rely on a pill pushing shrink who usually deals with lunatics and melancholy housewives, to determine I’m mentally impaired.

See? You’ve already made your decision, you lazy fool! You make an excuse by using a stereotypical psychiatrist, which represents the minority of them by the way! They are the ONLY ones with the qualifications to determine if you are truly impaired in the way you claim. So it IS as simple as I said. You’re just shit scared of finding out that you’re nothing more than lazy and you can’t do anything about that!

And some of the therapists I’ve been to over the years didn’t deny the impairments I made known to them. I’m not really sure what constitutes a diagnosis.

A piece of paper (maybe multiple pages) that says what’s wrong with you. I have that. They didn’t acknowledge any impairment in you, which I consider more significant. If they saw something, you’d have that piece of paper.

How am I preventing that? Think of what you’re trying to prevent.

You are undermining what is needed by opposing the philosophy of neurodiversity. That’s how you’re preventing it.

I’m trying to stop the individuals who want to prevent things from being done about it. I speak in favor of increasing the clarity of the understanding of the conditions to be dealt with.

Then stop trolling! You’re not increasing the clarity of it at all. You’re clouding it up with your lies and bullshit.

I assume you’re telling the truth about things such as that, so why don’t you do the same regarding me?

Because the evidence is overwhelming that you are a liar. It took you less than two hours to respond to me. If you really had the problems you claim to have, it would have taken all day. IF you were seeking assistance like you claim you were.

You’ve got a reputation, Cresp. If you really want to be respected you’re going to have to work very hard to resurrect what is right now a joke. That’s what you are – a joke.

I probably wouldn’t meet the criteria to get some subsidized service due to the lax funding from my government. What threat to the truth? What truth am I lying about? “You make an excuse by using a stereotypical psychiatrist, which represents the minority of them by the way!” I don’t think it’s really a minority, but I think I have to look for a psychiatrist that actually deals with disorders that cause mental weakness.

It’s up to them to determine a diagnosis, but not to determine that I’m impaired, as it’s been obvious to anyone who knows me long enough that I’m very impaired and that I can’t help it. My psychiatrist filled out a 4 page form about me which was designed by the agency I go to for vocational help. He filled it out illegibly and incompletely, and I think he’s in the process of recompleting it.

My circumstances aren’t due to lazyness. How could lazyness do all of the vile things that have been done to me? It wouldn’t make sense at all. So I responded to you within 2 hours. That’s enough time for me to deal with and rebut the antics of someone I’m already familiar with. If I was reading a book or article, it would require a long time for me to get just off a first page if I want to understand what I’m reading, and then I couldn’t count on remembering what I read. I read a lot slower than others and with low comprehension. I don’t even understand a lot of the words I see depending on the material. If none of the therapists saw any impairments in me, why did they have me in group therapy when I was 15, which was basically a social skills group? Why was I in some speech class when I was in 1st and 2nd grade while I was in special ed., as I already mentioned?

You have no basis to repudiate my explanations of my circumstances and you know it. You’re doing this to me because you don’t like what I have to say about things. If you keep slandering me, I’ll keep mercilessly bashing you and your circumstances. You don’t like it when it’s done to you.

“You are undermining what is needed by opposing the philosophy of neurodiversity” Who does that philosophy serve and how? And who is it trying to hurt? What is it needed for?

I probably wouldn’t meet the criteria to get some subsidized service due to the lax funding from my government.

There’s only one way to find out!

What threat to the truth? What truth am I lying about?

The truth of equality. You won’t support it.

I don’t think it’s really a minority, but I think I have to look for a psychiatrist that actually deals with disorders that cause mental weakness.

They all do. That’s their job.

It’s up to them to determine a diagnosis, but not to determine that I’m impaired, as it’s been obvious to anyone who knows me long enough that I’m very impaired and that I can’t help it.

You bet it’s their job to determine if you’re impaired, idiot!! And no it is NOT obvious – otherwise you would have had a diagnosis a long time ago! I’ve already proved it doesn’t exist anyway. Laziness is not an impairment.

My psychiatrist filled out a 4 page form about me which was designed by the agency I go to for vocational help. He filled it out illegibly and incompletely, and I think he’s in the process of recompleting it.

Let us know the result.

My circumstances aren’t due to lazyness. How could lazyness do all of the vile things that have been done to me?

It’s called karma.

It wouldn’t make sense at all. So I responded to you within 2 hours. That’s enough time for me to deal with and rebut the antics of someone I’m already familiar with.

If you had reading problems, no it would not. Far from it. Whether or not you think you know me has nothing to do with it. You still have to read what I say!

If I was reading a book or article, it would require a long time for me to get just off a first page if I want to understand what I’m reading, and then I couldn’t count on remembering what I read.

If this was true you’d take forever to respond to anyone – and I don’t see that happening!

I read a lot slower than others and with low comprehension. I don’t even understand a lot of the words I see depending on the material.

You understand enough to learn more. You just don’t want to because you are LAZY!!

If none of the therapists saw any impairments in me, why did they have me in group therapy when I was 15, which was basically a social skills group? Why was I in some speech class when I was in 1st and 2nd grade while I was in special ed., as I already mentioned?

You weren’t. I don’t believe you. I mentioned your reputation as a liar. This is the result. No one will believe you, and you have to provide a lot of tangible information to turn that around. Yes – that includes names of places like the Anon demanded.

You have no basis to repudiate my explanations of my circumstances and you know it.

You bet I do and I just did it again.

You’re doing this to me because you don’t like what I have to say about things.

I’m doing it because you are dangerous.

If you keep slandering me, I’ll keep mercilessly bashing you and your circumstances. You don’t like it when it’s done to you.

At least I can defend myself – which is more than you can do!

Who does that philosophy serve and how? And who is it trying to hurt? What is it needed for?

It serves those who are attacked by the likes of you, and everyone who calls those on the Autistic Spectrum “brain damaged”, which we are not. It hurts no one (except those who need to be hurt – like Best for instance) and it is needed for equality. Something that you don’t believe in, and that’s a key reason why you need to be dealt with.

“The truth of equality. You won’t support it.” You don’t even know what the [beep!] you’re talking about with your disordered thinking.
“They all do. That’s their job.” They do not all do. I have no recourse against them for their negligence. The system where I am favors them.
“You bet it’s their job to determine if you’re impaired, idiot!!” Listen you asswipe, I don’t need a professional to know I’m impaired when I know I can’t perform basic tasks. It’s their job to help me understand my impairments and name the condition. I don’t need a meteorologist to tell me it’s raining out.

“And no it is NOT obvious” Yes it is you bastard!! Don’t you contradict me you son of a bitch! Nobody has the right to deny my impairments! I have the details to tell of my impairments. I wasn’t diagnosed properly because the therapists are accustomed to dealing with lunatics and to peddling pharmaceutical drugs!

“Let us know the result.” I’m waiting for it to come. He wrote some stuff about why the program I was going into would be beneficial to me. He wrote in some number code that I couldn’t completely make out. It was 299. something. I couldn’t tell if he wrote .00 or .80

“If you had reading problems, no it would not.” Bull[honk!]. It doesn’t require a lot of new thought to respond to the obtuse and inane shit that comes from you and many of the other pieces of shit out there. It’s not the same thing as reading information packed articles and books. “You understand enough to learn more. You just don’t want to because you are LAZY!!” Dammit, you’re the lazy person! Get a damn job if it means begging your government on your hands and knees and agreeing to give up your antisocial personality and be compliant, or leave your country if they still don’t let you work there!

“You weren’t. I don’t believe you. I mentioned your reputation as a liar. This is the result. No one will believe you, and you have to provide a lot of tangible information to turn that around. Yes – that includes names of places like the Anon demanded.” You should, because I fucking said so. Nobody else without publicity on here has to go to greater lengths to have their statements assumed to be true. I’m not including names of entities so Anon, which may be you, can contact them and screw with me.

“I’m doing it because you are dangerous.” Dangerous to what/who? Stop acting like a vulnerable little wimp who needs to demonize me to protect himself!

“It serves those who are attacked by the likes of you, and everyone who calls those on the Autistic Spectrum “brain damaged”, which we are not. It hurts no one (except those who need to be hurt – like Best for instance) and it is needed for equality. Something that you don’t believe in, and that’s a key reason why you need to be dealt with.” I don’t like that it serves the super high-functioning selfish pigs, who are against equality, by enabling them to exploit the lower-functioning through keeping them down through the status-quo.

You don’t even know what the [beep!] you’re talking about with your disordered thinking.

I hit a nerve and you sink to insults. Way to win a debate, idiot!

They do not all do. I have no recourse against them for their negligence. The system where I am favors them.

Bull[honk!]! If you have a case for negligence, you get legal help!

Listen you asswipe, I don’t need a professional to know I’m impaired when I know I can’t perform basic tasks.

You CAN perform basic tasks. If you couldn’t you wouldn’t even be on the Internet. That’s another lie exposed. A professional is required to confirm it in order for you to get access to services.

It’s their job to help me understand my impairments and name the condition.

But they haven’t, right? That means you don’t have any!!

I don’t need a meteorologist to tell me it’s raining out.

Completely irrelevant.

Yes it is you bastard!! Don’t you contradict me you son of a bitch! Nobody has the right to deny my impairments!

Yes we do. You’re a liar. A cheat. And we’ve worked you out. Want to stop me? PROVE YOU HAVE IMPAIRMENTS! A good start would be to shut down this blog, because it is proving you wrong every time you type something!

I have the details to tell of my impairments. I wasn’t diagnosed properly because the therapists are accustomed to dealing with lunatics and to peddling pharmaceutical drugs!

Or they knew there was nothing wrong with you!

Bull[honk!]. It doesn’t require a lot of new thought to respond to the obtuse and inane shit that comes from you and many of the other pieces of shit out there.

Yes it does. If you refuse to open yourself up to new thought that’s your fault. And it’s further proof of your laziness.

It’s not the same thing as reading information packed articles and books.

LOL! You bet it is. Another lie exposed.

Dammit, you’re the lazy person! Get a damn job if it means begging your government on your hands and knees and agreeing to give up your antisocial personality and be compliant, or leave your country if they still don’t let you work there!

I can’t leave, idiot! They have to change their tune and that’s what I’m doing! Hardly lazy! And I’ve already told you about the CMO! Ignoring information is lazy, and it also proves that you are willing to be so.

You should, because I [beep!]ing said so.

Oh wow what an intelligent reparte! You say so? With your rep for lying – THAT’S NOT ENOUGH!!

Nobody else without publicity on here has to go to greater lengths to have their statements assumed to be true.

If they have a rep for lying they do.

I’m not including names of entities so Anon, which may be you, can contact them and screw with me.

I wasn’t even home when the Anon posted (I knew you’d try that typical line) but it doesn’t matter. It would only screw you if you lie. Why would I screw with you if I find out you’re telling the truth? I’d have to back down and admit you actually told the truth – so it would be a good idea to give!

Dangerous to what/who? Stop acting like a vulnerable little wimp who needs to demonize me to protect himself!

Dangerous to everyone on the Autistic Spectrum, because you are a threat to the support structures that are needed for those who are left behind.

I don’t like that it serves the super high-functioning selfish pigs, who are against equality, by enabling them to exploit the lower-functioning through keeping them down through the status-quo.

This is why you are dangerous. Equality applies to EVERYONE! Including the low functioning. Your claim slanders the concept of neurodiversity and is another example of how dangerous you are.

One more lie exposed – this post of yours took just 36 minutes! Still can’t read or write well? You are so full of [honk!].

That’s it. I’m done here. No more.

There was also the brief note on the second thread which lead to this;

Phil, she is talking childish platitudes that nobody truly believes. It’s condescending and I hate the detriment that results from adhering to such a mindset. How are you for equality? What she says isn’t harmonious with or permissive of equality.

And I suppose you are harmonious? You reap what you sow.

Harmonious with what? What is your point? I argued that what she says isn’t consistent with a favoring of equality.

And you’re wrong – and arguing that without a single basis in fact. In other words, you’re being a troll again. Old habits die hard don’t they?

Phil, I’m not wrong. What I said isn’t deniable. There is no way to decipher what she wrote as being in agreement with all forms of equality. You have no facts.

No, YOU don’t have any facts. You’re being a typical troll just making trouble.

Phil, stop calling anyone a troll who dares to disagree with you. I’m not having a factual legalistic argument just to analyze something that someone said. Try to refute what I said or shut up! I didn’t make the trouble. The trouble were the statements that were said that I responded to.

Cresp, you are trolling. You are against equality. That’s all I need to say to refute you – and prove that you are an idiot and a threat to the Spectrum support structures that are required. A threat that doesn’t listen – and is therefore a troll.

Making trouble by denying equality. Shut up.

Phil, while there exists those with low mental capacity and those who are very adept, apt, and capable, there undeniably is inequality. That’s what I hate. Whose side are you on in that issue? If you want to refute me, you have to back up what you claim about me. Who believes the word of you about anything as if you’re an absolute authority on anything? I’m getting sick of this giant fucking ego of yours. Oh how dare I be a troublemaker and speak out against the status quo.

You’re the one with the ego, Cresp! And you don’t like it when I deflate it as it deserves to be. You hate being unequal? GOOD! Now do something about it! Oh that’s right – you won’t because you’re LAZY! That’s the refuting you wanted. I’ve backed up everything I’ve claimed and you don’t want to know about it!

You don’t have a low mental capacity. You couldn’t run this blog if you did.

I’m starting to enjoy myself here. You love giving yourself enough rope to hang yourself. Keep it up!

Phil, I can’t help being unequal. I can’t fix my weak brain as there may not yet be a way to do so. I can’t be as adept as others who have brains that are much better functioning and built up. I don’t have access to their brains. It doesn’t require much mental capacity to run a blog. What things I can do aren’t enough to get by on. What is your conception about the concept of equality? What are your real thoughts on it, and be specific?

You don’t have a weak brain. You have a lazy brain, which can be fixed. It does require more mental capacity than you claim you have! Equality is everyone being treated fairly and as human beings. Not as inferior, and not be denied services that they have a right to. Anyone who tries to make these claims based on a lie (as you do) is not entitled to fair treatment. Your behaviour seeks to deny our efforts to be regarded as human beings. The fact that you try to put yourself over as inferior is the giveaway. You aren’t. Laziness doesn’t make you inferior. It makes you a joke.

That’s my last comment on this blog.

From now on my commentary will be in this area. Any further comments on the first two threads will get a new commentary entry instead of an update to this one.

Billy Cresp, you have no idea.

“BILLY CRESP” as LURKER wrote;
Someone called Kowalski says the idea of a cure for the disabling aspects of autism doesn’t make sense, as she claims the disabling aspects are the “flipsides” of the amazing capabilities that “they” have. Well, that seems so convincing since she decided not to mention that the disabling aspects are concentrated in the autistics who are lower functioning, the same ones who get few of the benefits, while the ones on the spectrum who get the lion’s share of the amazing capabilities, are often the ones who aren’t saddled with the burden of the disabling aspects, and go on without impairments. So when it comes to an individual, the disabling aspects aren’t inseparable from the capabilities. But across the spectrum, the flipsides are inherent.

This is another instance of an anti-cure slime disregarding and lying about the tremendous gap in functional level between the very high-functioning aspies and the similar, and the low-functioning. Some of them even pretend to be disgusted by the idea of involving hierarchy, by saying they don’t like the hierarchy that the use of high and low functioning labels creates! Heeelllooo?! The hierarchy is already around, and has been around for a long time, the same hierarchy that you benefit from, and consequently support and defend with considerable effort! What do you think it’s called the autistic SPECTRUM for? These phonies are not clueless about the unfair reality, and are basically trying to distract and confuse others from it and about it, to keep themselves from looking like the greedy elites that they really are!

Here’s another example of Cresp trying to undermine support structures.

If the low functioning did the things that were needed (and a cure is not required) the only remaining “disabling effect” would be society. The way we are all treated as inferior. That’s what Kowalski would be talking about. Cresp is trying to ride on the coat tails of LFA’s – when he has no right to claim any comparison with them at all. LFA’s have to battle and they do. Cresp doesn’t bother because he has given up – and unlike LFA’s he has no excuse.

Billy Cresp is emphasising a stereotype – which benefits his agenda of enabling himself and justifying his laziness. He willfully ignores what is really going on with others, and won’t admit that what is happening to him is karma for his laziness.

“BILLY CRESP” as LURKER wrote;
Where does Kim Wombles get off talking of community building? She doesn’t give a shit about having any egalitarian community. Stand up for those who can’t stand for themselves? She doesn’t want them to be capable of standing for themselves in pursuit of their own interests or to even know they have a natural right to do so. What can this lead to besides the paternalistic caregivers/protectors bolstering their higher position in society while aggrandizing themselves further, and then telling the vulnerable ones that they “protect”, what they do and do not have a right to?

Redefine success she says? I’m disgusted at what she redefines it as. Being of service to others as success means shit in that context. The hell with living to serve; to serve those of a higher stratum! I hate the idea of accepting and settling for mediocre outcomes. Success won’t need to be redefined for the fortunate ones on the spectrum who aren’t mentally impaired, as they get even extra success. Make the world a “softer” place? What a bunch of cornball nonsense! What is the point of this phony “acceptance”? This has nothing to do with caring about dignity and prosperity for all! She has no business complaining about “dehumanization” while her goal only guarantees the lower functioning the social status of pets!

Why shouldn’t the parents be disappointed if they care for their childrens’ future? The disappointment isn’t much different from the disappointment that is experienced by the unfortunate autistic individuals themselves. I wonder which autistic individuals she wants the issues in the autistic community to be about, and who she thinks those same individuals should get to enforce their will on. Kickass kumbaya?! What kind of bullshit is that? I call it kissass kumbaya, as it involves kissing the asses of the privileged pigs who want to be in charge, while letting those creeps undermine future chances for drastic therapeutic help that would bring so much fortune to those without it!
Screw the idea of all involved getting along and pretending everything is fine, and that all of them have the same advantage and are getting a decent deal, with a bunch of phony smiles on their faces! That makes me want to hurl! No peace. No kumbaya until the enemies lose their grip on control and real reform is done. Euphemism saturated positivity bullshit won’t fix anything! Her benevolent attitude seems very phony considering her comparison of one parent’s efforts at therapy for her child to Munchausen’s syndrome, and her thinking that parents who dare complain about their child’s condition should be smacked upside the head to bring them back to “reality”. I’d like to see her and that other snotty liar Corina who also likes the idea try it. I wonder how it would turn out for them.

Cresp, you’ve got no idea. Kim’s on the ball and you don’t want to know about it. You’re against equality – that’s obvious.

“BILLY CRESP” as LURKER wrote;
What would timelord and the other guy do if they didn’t have me to bash? Where do you get off calling me “lazy” after all you heard of me?! What makes you so much more diligent than me? Whether or not I personally don’t deserve to be spared of your ridicule isn’t the issue to me. I would detest letting you make an example out of me, making out what you do to me a reason why one shouldn’t dare stand against the agenda you defend. I also hate that you ridicule and try to undermine others who really are innocent. I can’t ignore that you and your phony friends use me to try to boost your egos and reputations, anytime I raise an objection, even well after I said something! I think you get too much pleasure from demonizing me. And timelord, stop trying to silence me! Stop trying to muzzle anyone who doesn’t tolerate your crazy ideas!

Oh wah wah wah!

Cresp, if anyone has an ego problem it’s you. I’m crushing it as it deserves to be and you can’t handle it because I’ve worked you out. I’m not the only one either. I call you lazy because that’s what you are. You can work. You are NT. You have no excuse. You try to hang around the Autistic community to justify yourself, and I make an example out of you because you ask for it. You are not innocent. Neither are the others I have a go at. I don’t get pleasure out of demonising you. I do it because it needs to be done to protect the community from dead wood. And that’s what you are. I do it out of annoyance – not pleasure.

You deserve to be silenced. You have nothing to contribute to the Autistic community. You should be contributing elsewhere. In real life. Get off your rear end and do something with your life. You have no excuse. Calling my ideas “crazy” only proves that you are desperate to justify your bona fide laziness. I’m not falling for it, and neither is anyone else. You are a liar, a cheat and if you were on SSI a swindler who I would report in a heartbeat.

I had a feeling you’d open a blog after you were kicked off umpteen others!