“BILLY CRESP” as LURKER wrote;
I’ve been looking around to hear some stuff about what went on with Autreat this year. It still lives up to an annoying and disturbing reputation. Seems like there was a lot of pseudo-intellectual hogwash discussed at the presentations, that likely had hardly anything to do with actually making various conditions somewhat tolerable for many on the spectrum. I heard that in attendance, there were some advocates who work with local agencies and organizations, so I wonder what accomplishments are being made by them. 

I wonder how much funding it requires to bankroll conferences like this, and how various entities came to decisions to appropriate money for it. Yet still there is so much stress involved in getting services and programs accessible for many on the spectrum. I think of the lack of money spent on such things and the misallocation of resources going on, while something like this is somehow funded, which has so many pointless, over-hyped aspects to it. I have waited around for over a year while dealing with bureaucracies in various ways, to try to get services, since before and even after I received my Aspergers diagnosis. So many that I’ve dealt with seem not to know what to do with me. And the waiting time I’m dealing with so far, is lucky compared to the very long delays experienced by so many others on the spectrum. I seldom see the anti-cure individuals specifically talk of such inefficiencies when mentioning the need for services. I heard on Clay Adams’ blog that Amanda Baggs couldn’t attend, which is nice to hear, but that she sent an audio which was presented.

I get tired of how things like Autreat are purported to provide environments likable and convenient for autistics, while they are so willing to exclude real autistics who refuse to agree with their nonsense, and even invite non-autistics to join them, and ones that are screwing over the majority of autistics at that. Such as the hack autism researcher Morton Gernsbacher, who did a presentation this year in which she used her credentials to repudiate functioning labels. They also had some thing called “Ask an NT” Panel. I wonder what kind of a farce that was designed to be.

Since Autreat claims to be run by autistics for autistics, I wonder which autistics among them they have in mind, since they also say that they focus on “positive living with autism”, but not on causes and cures, which are things of interest to many on the spectrum. These leaders have let it be obvious that they’re happy to team up with some slimy characters who are non-autistic, to help undermine efforts to devise a cure and to even understand why one is needed. I know from this that Autreat is just another instance of intellectually-elite autistics serving their own interests to further their own success, while suppressing the needs of the deeply impaired autistics.

Listen up, Cresp – and don’t bother replying because it will be modded out. The whole point of Autreat (and anything else related to it) is to promote understanding of the Autistic Spectrum. Without that understanding it will not be possible to help those on the lower end of the Spectrum. That kind of rhetoric (“That likely had hardly anything to do with actually making various conditions somewhat tolerable for many on the spectrum”) shows how little you know about what is really going on!

No one knows how to deal with you, Cresp, because you don’t want to be helped. And probably because the services in your area are BS anyway (that’s a general problem). They are BS because no one really understands the Spectrum – except to regard it as something to fear when all that does is hold back the very services that are needed.

I’ve said this before – and as a person who is not a doctor – I don’t believe you are on the Spectrum. You’re a con artist, and I use your past history as a back up for this belief. You can squeal to whoever will listen all you want. It’s not going to change that. People like YOU are the ones screwing over genuine Spectrum people – including LFA’s. And as far as I know, the only genuine Autistic who was denied access was Shelley/Droopy – and that had nothing to do with her being on the Spectrum. It was to do with her volatile attitude and her lack of reliability. All she wants is a platform to push her BS, and she’s not going to get it because it inhibits the understanding of the Spectrum that Autreat is all about.

One more thing – the “Ask an NT” panel was and is a great idea. It allows those on the Spectrum to ask questions about the NT world so we can understand the theory of it better. I know of at least one person on the Spectrum who is desperate for that sort of info, and I understand the importance of it.

I doubt Cresp really knows what’s important, except his little con job.

Boy – the more Cresp tries to yack when he knows he’s being modded out, the more he proves how much of a liar he is. My new entry attracted the following nonsense (and the next person I don’t know that looks at this page gets kicked off the Phil’s World website as a spy for him).

Mentioning something so obvious, such as that a mental condition is invisible, isn’t an innocent act. It is a tactic meant to weaken the level of a discussion to allow their nonsense agenda a better hearing.

It’s not a tactic or an act, idiot. You don’t know what you’re talking about.

I know what a disability is and you pervert it’s meaning and have sick views on it.

YOU don’t know what a disability is, as Tex ably proved on the reply blog.

Common sense needs no research. You are employing virtually no logical sense.

This coming from a fool who has no common sense.

Impairments do not consist of discrimination and fear of the unknown, which are not the causes of the gruesome impairments many have to suffer. Impairment isn’t difference.

The law says it is, again as Tex demonstrated. Fear creates situations that lead to impairments becoming a major life issue.

The lack of other individuals liking you and some similar to you, doesn’t cause other autistics to be highly impaired.

This is a ridiculous analogy designed to try and justify my thought patterns on a totally alien line.

I have a diagnosis on the spectrum so shut up with that “you’re not one of us” tactic.

I won’t, because you are a liar and a con artist.

Accept that I’m personally offended by your expressed views.

Good. Be offended, because that’s what con artists deserve.

Don’t you intimidate me by saying I’m bordering on slander.

If you are intimidated by the truth that’s not my problem. Bailing to playing the victim on legality is a typical con artist’s whine.

I know of your slander. I’ve done lots of work recently compared to the absolutely no work you’ve done for many years.

No you haven’t. All you’ve done is be lazy and do nothing. I’m not lazy. I work – and well beyond what you do. I just don’t get paid for it (except umpiring and that doesn’t pay the bills). I’m not allowed to work full time for pay until I get that medical report off my file (per the Commonwealth Medical Officer).

I don’t call anyone not disabled on account of them not being visibly impaired.

LIAR! That’s EXACTLY what you did to Sarah in the original entry!

I call them not disabled on account of them being not disabled, due to them claiming virtually no impairments.

And that’s what I’m talking about – there are impairments. Societal impairments, which are just as devastating.

To know if someone is disabled, basic observation is what is needed. Not just vision.

Completely and utterly wrong, and yet another example of Cresp’s very poor ‘I’m disabled’ act. If he really was on the Spectrum he would know this. But he doesn’t. Case closed.

“BILLY CRESP” as LURKER wrote;
Sarah’s recent post over at autisticcats.blogspot.com is yet another undermining of what can be considered disabilty. A very cruel one in my opinion. She ponders what it is like to disclose one’s identity of autism and what worries her about it, and complains of possible negative reactions towards her from others from it. I’m disturbed by seeing this nonsense about “invisible” disability and “disclosure”, which she brings up.

She has no business claiming any “identity” as a disabled person if it’s based on ideas like “invisible disability” and disclosure of “disability”. If one has a real mental disability, there’s no such thing as concealing it for significant amounts of time, therefore any question of disclosure of it is absurd. Such a disability is apparent eventually as complete sets of abilities are very often needed and shortfalls in them are noticeable. I’m talking common sense here. There is no way of avoiding the specific problems resulting from it, without keeping away from the situations involved. The way it is now, being known as autistic along with mental health “stuff”, as she describes, doesn’t necessarily qualify as disability, or at least shouldn’t be considered to. 

The implications of someone who isn’t impaired disclosing a diagnosis, are way different compared to those that would result based on someone who is significantly impaired. I can’t determine what motivation she would have to tell others about her autism, and what reasonable outcome she would look for. I don’t know what understanding of her from others she seeks. If only she wouldn’t misconstrue the basic concept of what disability is by even just bringing it into her trivial discussion of disclosure and others’ reactions to disclosure. Her reputation with those she knows at graduate school likely isn’t delicate or in turmoil, as it would be for those who are known to be impaired and who are in less rewarding settings. When those in her position talk to others they know about their autism, I can’t expect that their descriptions of it to them won’t be done in a way that will distort others’ perceptions of what it can be like for many of those with autism and how it should be handled. 

How dare she complain about “ableism”, with her directing indignation at the disabled themselves! And for what? For viewing disability as awful and tragic! (As if such a natural thought would have to be taught.) Her and the other vermin shouldn’t go on the assumption that autism presupposes disability, as many of them themselves lack disability, unless they would consider questioning whether or not they should be labeled autistic. I surely don’t expect them to not consider themselves autistic, but it must be acknowledged that those highly-abled autistics do not have a stake in the disability issue that concerns autism. They don’t bear the burden of the impairments that they declare as being just and not of negative quality.

Just when I thought Cresp had finally shut up! *rolls eyes*

This is the perfect example of a post by a con artist. That’s right, Cresp, I mean YOU!

If you met me, you would NOT be able to see my Aspergers. This applies to most with that condition. It’s a practical fact. The only ones that it doesn’t apply to are the ones who have it badly enough for it to be in plain sight. Cresp claims that if it’s not in plain sight, it’s not a disability – and speaking in purely legal terminology, that’s a crock of crap.

This is why Cresp fails to prove he is one of us and exposes himself as a con artist. All because he doesn’t really know what a disability is in both societal and legal terms. It’s far wider than he wants us to believe it is – and that shows that he hasn’t done his research.

The Autistic Spectrum in all it’s forms is seen as a disability. Cresp can’t get around that fact. We bear the burden of societal discrimination based in fear of the unknown. That is an impairment – an impairment that is not our fault. People like Cresp use that fear in their attempted con to try and intentionally misrepresent the Spectrum, and in the process Cresp ceases to be a part of the solution as he tries to be. He’s part of the problem – especially as he is not on the Spectrum. He is a liar as well as a con artist and his only impairment is laziness.

Never ever call anyone with no visible impairments not disabled, Cresp. It’s inherently wrong and borders on slander by proxy.

Cresp still doesn’t know what modding out means. Here’s the reply he just tried to put up, again where he can’t see it.

Phil, you really don’t know much about anything. You seem so confused. You should go back to school. You don’t even know what capitalism is, or really what disability is. If you did, you would know it doesn’t make sense to call lazyness an impairment.

This is Cresp’s whole problem. He doesn’t know what capitalism is and never will because he is caught up in it and doesn’t want to understand it because it’s second skin to him. Not only that, he completely missed my point – again because it’s like second skin. His level of laziness is impairing him. You only have to look at his rantings to see that he creating every excuse in the book. He doesn’t want to learn.

I have an official diagnosis. You don’t seem capable of even understanding my viewpoints on disability and economics.

Diagnosis of what? Nothing – that’s what. I am perfectly capable of understanding what you say, Cresp, and I have taken you to bits and you don’t want to listen.

You don’t know much about genetic makeup either. Where is your evidence that treatment for sensory overload will prevent one from continuing to be low-functioning?

Everywhere. Every single improvement reported has a base in sensory overload. Even with Sam Best.

Give it up already. Nobody wants to not be independent. Stop defending those two deranged creeps. If it weren’t for those like me to antagonize, they would only regard you as shit.

There are some who have no choice not to be independent, idiot! Would you deny them the help that they need simply because they can’t be independent? I will defend Almandite and Kowalski – and anyone else you attack for one very simple reason. They are decent human beings who are doing the right thing.

You on the other hand, only have hate to offer. Nothing else because your views are warped and out of fairy land – pure and simple.

UPDATE – He put in another post and instead of putting in a new entry I figured I should add it here instead.

I don’t care if you don’t let this up. I just want you to see this. You refuse to make a reasoned argument with me and are consequently doing nothing to refute me. I shouldn’t assume you know what you’re talking about when you mention capitalism and the such.

I made a reasoned argument. This idiot doesn’t understand anything and I’ve buried him on it and he hasn’t got the guts to admit it.

I received an Aspergers diagnosis about 3 months ago. What qualified professional says that getting rid of sensory overload is all that is necessary for improvement? Stop making stuff up.

You don’t have Aspergers. If you did you would have been diagnosed years ago.

It’s not fair that some can’t be independent. Independence should be a guarantee.

Then shut up. You are stopping independence with your pathetic attitude.

Kowalski and Almandite can be independent. Almandite has psychological problems, which she basically admits, and they are causing her to act as she does.

And she does something despite it – which is more than I can say for you!

Kowalski is a con artist who is ripping off her government if what she says about her situation is true. She has no need for a caregiver. The things she tells in her own writing show that she isn’t impaired to need such benefits. I think she is vile for speaking on behalf of autistics with her twisted credibility. She has nothing but disgust for those who she pretends to advocate for, as she spews such condescending lies. That welfare addict should have her benefits cut off and be made to pay them back.

That proves Cresp is an extreme capitalist. She wouldn’t be getting anything if there wasn’t a visible restriction of some sort. It proves he’s a slanderer as well.

You are a hypocrit for saying I only have hate to offer. What do you offer other people besides hate if they don’t submit themselves to your will?

That’s laughable. People don’t have to submit to my views in order for me to like them. I have plenty of allies who don’t submit to my will. I fail to see the need to list them. It’s only those who slander me and hate on me that I hate. I have plenty to offer – the truth. Something that Cresp has no grasp off at all. All because he can do nothing but hate.

UPDATE #2 – And he’s still at it!

Another psychiatrist earlier said in his opinion I have Aspergers. Don’t bash me for my history of diagnoses and the lack thereof. What were you diagnosed with before you were diagnosed with Aspergers?

Chronic Personality Disorder – before the DSM-IV which was the key reason for the re-diagnosis. You don’t have that excuse.

Don’t blame me for the bullshit your side is trying to keep in place. The anti-cure scumbags are the ones to blame for lack of independence.

Wrong! The anti-cure people are the ones who find success or know success is possible withOUT a cure – and success can only come with independence! You’ll never be independent because you’re too lazy to make the effort.

Don’t you dare define my views against what I really think.

I will because your definitions are at variants with reality.

Kowalski has inconsistencies in what she writes about her abilities. I know that welfare states are being ripped off by lazy bums who don’t want to work, but who work the system instead.

Why don’t you report her then? I know why – because you’re a gutless coward.

She doesn’t need someone to cook and clean for her when she’s indicated nonchalantly that she can cook and clean.

So? What a stupid point to make.

My disgust for scum who push for benefits they don’t need on the taxpayer’s back, doesn’t mean I like capitalism at all.

Yes it does. Extremist capitalists oppose all taxes and oppose the welfare state utterly. That’s you.

I’ve heard about those who you’ve ridiculed. You make me sick. You have no conscience. You pick on those who have problems that can’t easily be dealt with. Your imaginary truth doesn’t count.

You are the one with no conscience, because you refuse to admit that you are lazy and won’t get off your rear end and do something with your life. I do more than you do even without a job!

I’ve got a suspicion that Cresp is getting past his ban and seeing these updates. I’ll have to check for a spy. This entry will not be added to however. If Cresp posts again I’ll do a new entry instead.

“BILLY CRESP” as LURKER wrote;
Two of the shit talking creeps I’ve previously written about, are saying some weird things this time in their pursuits to craft the perception that others have of them regarding what they preach. Almandite is at it again with her applying her own emotional instability to issues that affect far many others besides her in ways she doesn’t bear the highest burden of. She claims that independent living at college isn’t going well for her but she can’t explain why or what’s making it problematic. What a fucking joke.

One either has a problem or doesn’t, and explaining it shouldn’t be a mystery. When I was away at college for the first semester, I knew what awful problems I had in living on my own around others at the dormitory which led me to leave the dorm, and I knew what I was feeling about it. I had my mind on real problems. I hurt over real problems. She hasn’t enumerated any actual problems she has with living on her own, but rather seems to be to an unbalanced emotional wreck. She goes on with some daft ideas about what others may be thinking about her in regards to her wanting and seeking help and other things, which she admits they may not even be thinking and haven’t even said to her.

Then this freak goes on to cite her own crazed circumstances and thoughts to back up her vile claim that independence shouldn’t be pushed, and again bashes the recognition of functional levels. Then she works her way to a long winded explanation of hers about why independence isn’t necessary or wanted by all! She claims she shouldn’t be considered high-functioning and even goes on to dismissively complain about the “stereotype” of the low-functioning autistic. I wish she would stop ridiculing the highly disabled on the spectrum, who don’t have or need fabricated emotional reasons for why they aren’t doing well.

Kowalski just went on with a bunch of pretentious complaints, but also, an interesting list of which groups within neurodiversity she feels compelled to lash out at. I wonder how extreme, or particularly how coercive, she would like the agenda to be. This makes me wonder if she is just a marginal individual within neuroperversity’s domain of influence. I’m sick of how she fronts like she’s some impressive radical who is all into “social justice” issues, to make what she has to say seem important and helpful and not as just the destructive ideas of a spoiled misanthrope. 

I’m convinced this phony is deceptively exaggerating in claiming to be impaired with her ridiculous and contradictory stories of herself. Seems to me she just doesn’t want to get a job. This welfare-state leeching gutter rat has no credibility pretending to be a marginalized underdog with progressive virtue. Makes me want to hurl. The hypocrisy of slobs like them makes me cringe in anger. I think it’s interesting Kowalski mentions she has difficulty with anger and bites herself, because I also bite myself in anger when reading hers and others’ restraining and oppressive lies crafted as anti-oppression.

It would sicken me if slime such as them were accepted to any extent as the voice of disability from the spectrum. The formation of this kind of a perception of the disadvantaged on the spectrum, in the minds of those who have the authority to affect policy, is one that can’t be afforded by the highly disabled on the spectrum who are already up against enough problems, especially when it comes to getting access to help. 

I’m sitting here while actually being highly disabled, also being confirmed as such with diagnosis, and I have to know that these poindexter scum are out there making a mockery of the reality of mental disability, pretending it makes sense to supposedly care so much yet wanting impairment to remain, all while this comes out of the mouths of those who aren’t impaired, many of whom can or will get to live it up as they please if they please! 

Where are such choices for everyone else? For those who don’t have basic abilities ensured to them who have to deal with others to just get by? For those who don’t have genius IQs? Where do they get off omitting to explain how “social justice” isn’t violated by those advocates having obscene amounts of abilities and therefore choices and opportunities, while others are forced to begging and neediness? Well, they of course would continue to pretend that no such disparity in opportunity exists, nor that meaningful disparities in ability exist. It enrages me how some of the cognitively privileged so carelessly misuse and waste their opportunities, while I could only dream of what I would do with my ambitions had I possessed their aptitude.

Here we go again. More attacks on Almandite and Kowalski – derived from Cresp’s own warped idealogy based in pure hate and zero understanding.

Calling Almandite emotionally unstable is the pot calling the kettle black. Almandite has a great connection with her emotions and understands them. Cresp has no idea – remember that this idiot places no value on self esteem so he places no value in emotion. And yet he’s a whine bag. Contradictory and no mistake, and that includes this ridiculous notion that Almandite can’t explain why she has a problem and therefore she doesn’t know if she has a problem or not. That’s beyond ridiculous actually – that’s completely insane! Cresp can’t talk about others when he in effect confesses being wrecked himself. Here’s a question – what problems, huh? Specifics! That’s what you want from Almandite so for consistency – GIVE! Calling her a “freak” is out of order and should be withdrawn. Independence should not be pushed if someone doesn’t want it. To push someone against their own will is a basic human rights abuse.

As far as the low functioning go – Cresp fails to realise that they can function at a higher level, as long as they are treated early enough for sensory overload. Nowadays if someone misses that, the parents (or the system – I know some schools and health places have been stupid when it comes to this issue) are negligent. There is no ridicule. The fact is that they have problems just like we do. And society is at the root of it in both respects. Sheer hate brought on by fear of Autism – in all it’s forms. A fear that Cresp propogates and it’s why I oppose him (along with the fact that he isn’t one of us and has no issues except his own self inflicted issues with laziness).

Cresp then went to Kowalski again, and clearly he has no respect for social justice. This makes him a serious threat to the freedom of the Autistic community – in fact he would be a threat to the freedom on anyone who is victimised socially for whatever the reason (and it happens within the NT community as well). Again, he engaged in a case of the pot calling the kettle black calling Kowalski a “phony”. Cresp is clearly an extremist capitalist who believes in the concept of user pays and keeping government out of any service that is provided. Again – that is why the US economy is in such a mess. You are an oppressor, Cresp – like it or not. You are not highly disabled. There is no name for what you claim to have so there can not be a proper and correct diagnosis. Your impairment is laziness, and it’s up to YOU to fix it. But you don’t want to – so you have no right to complain what you brought on yourself. Real impairment within the Autistic community is there for life. That’s not a want. That’s not an available choice. One can’t change their skin colour or any part of their genetic make up.

Cresp has absolutely no idea what he’s talking about.

Note to all readers – at a suggestion from SBWG, if anyone has booted Cresp from their blog aside from who’s on the blog roll on the right, let me know in the comments.

I knew it! Cresp doesn’t know what modding out means. I put up the new entry, and he tries to reply. Well, here is the reply – where he can’t see it.

Why don’t you have your momma fund your personal interests and crusades, instead of having the state play that gentle, unconditional, and spoiling role with you?

Because that’s not her job. She’s retired.

I think you should think of being creative by thinking of other things to accuse me of, instead of the things you just accused me of.

I think you should just stop whining when I tell the truth about you, and cop it on the chin like a man.

“many more tax payers dollars that would otherwise be needed” Hehe. Look at who is talking about excessive use of tax payer dollars. Maybe they should make you a bureaucrat who gets to choose what tax payer dollars are appropriated to.

Sure. And guess what? I’d be a hero to the entire Autistic community (except those who want a cure and nothing else).

Those children don’t need Julia to get blubbery with those attitudes you mentioned of them. I think they have their own mothers.

Who can’t cope and need people like Julia to pick up the slack. Yet another attack. Bravo.

They need someone to help them have a life of some status/prosperity, but as that’s impermissible in today’s stratified society, the slight help she gives will have to be settled for, until things change someday.

This is “slight” help? Bull! It’s more help than Mr Negative here realises.

Show me how to construct a positive la land: where there is nothing but positive! Anything awful happening to anyone who survives it, don’t frown! It’s great somehow! Ohhh, don’t stop non-fatal atrocities from occuring, you just have to be positive! Cause, nothing isn’t positive! Anyone benefiting from suffering brought to others, uh, ignore that and don’t think of that ever again! Just think positive and only positive. Negative isn’t real and is just in your mind! All I have to do is think happy thoughts, not do great and difficult things! You just have to think of the positives of being an ignorant loser! Because you’re just super! Oooh, positive! Everything is so great, no matter what!

I know that was sarcastic. It just goes to show how little he understands about the power of positive thinking – so to speak. This paragraph will be very useful in a court room to prove his delusion.

Cresp is now being modded out, and he couldn’t help himself – so here’s his latest entry;

I can’t stand ignoramuses and dupes who talk about “balance” with no meaningful context or understanding.

I can’t stand ignorant fools who ignore meaningful statements to make a cheap point that only serves to demonstrate how little they know about the issue, and are too scared to admit it.

Live? What do you mean live? What do you know of what living is considered outside of some abstract concept of it being positive, with it having no actual consideration in a real context?

Asking a question like this demonstrates even more ignorance. He doesn’t know how to live – and that’s horrific to say the least!

If your government is really giving you the right to enforce your views on others, then they are sick.

That’s slander again, because that’s not what I said. I said that they give me the right to defend myself from slander.

But I think likely that they just want you out of their hands while they’re not involved in your legal affairs.

Government only funds services. They aren’t involved in the nitty gritty – that’s the job of the legal profession.

You desperately need to be educated. Look up the contemporary features of your economic system and then the definition of socialism, and then think of whether or not you should say true socialism is at work.

There you go everyone – a version of “America’s system is the best in the world”. What a lot of bull. I’ll bet Cresp’s definition of socialism is drawn out of the 1950’s, when it was seen as communism when it’s not.

I’m not slandering you. Slander doesn’t consist of expressing subjective opinions and telling things that are true of you.

That’s the point. You aren’t telling the truth and you have been told it isn’t true. Ignorance is not a defence. Expressing untrue opinions intentionally is slander when it damages – and you are damaging me.

Who do you think you are to blame society that funds your lifestyle and lets you act as a raving lunatic as you do?

Society should be helping me get a job, starting with helping me wipe out that CMO report – and treating me like a human being.

Don’t you dare call me a threat!

You’re a threat! THAT is true and I can prove it. What are you going to do about it, little boy?

I want to know why you think you should have the right to enforce your wishes and ideas on my life, as you would try to keep me in my awful circumstances!

You’re doing that to yourself.

You’re not putting me in any legal trouble! You’re not going to intimidate me!

You’re intimidated. That all proves it without a doubt.

Who’s the liar when you sometimes don’t have or apparently want a real understanding of the issues being discussed?

You are the one who doesn’t understand and doesn’t want to.

I don’t follow orders from you! I think you should shut up about the posts I make.

No, I won’t – because you are dangerous and need to be corrected and in public as well.

If you leave me alone, I’ll gladly leave you alone, to never to talk to you again. I don’t want to deal with you. Back off!!!

No. You first. Shut down your blog. Leave EVERYONE alone. Your warped opinions mean nothing in the real world.

And just quickly from the other entry he tried to get through.

Scratcher, what the hell is a dip?

I can answer that – dip is short for dipstick.

What the hell do you do besides being a worthless lapdog?

I rang Craig and asked him this, and his answer is “I am Phil’s friend, and I support his views. Do you know what a friend is, dip? Not worthless and not a flaming lapdog!” (quoted word for word)

“BILLY CRESP” as LURKER wrote;
Predictably, she says I misrepresent her, and refers to me as a troll. Anyone who calls them on their nonsense is somehow a troll. “Discussion” to them can’t be anything other than agreement and reinforcement. I didn’t make a post to counter her simply because she deletes my comments. If she and the other creeps won’t let my responses be heard, I make even longer ones on my own territory so others can view. That’s why I’ve written all of the posts I’ve done so far. I wondered if it would convince them to consider letting me comment on their place instead, as it wouldn’t be as scathing. I just don’t want to let their despotic bullshit go unchallenged. She then explains herself as if she’s just writing her thoughts and considerations of things, as if she’s not trying to prove points.

“It is a crime to be shocked by and proud of your students?” Why misrepresent what you’re proud of and blow it out of proportion? If she’s so proud, why won’t she just act pleased with only what went well? 
“Is it a crime to engage in armchair philosophy–armchair only because I haven’t finished my degree?” It should be expected to have some real reasoning for the expressed thoughts, and not have ridiculous conclusions that don’t follow from the premises. But I’ve basically seen an attempt to make a point that many others with the same ploy are trying to make. The level of misconception caused by all of those trying to lie about what intelligence is, is something to be noticed and complained of.

“this is the internet. If you don’t like it, don’t read it” Got to be fucking kidding me! As if she doesn’t tend to have many readers who consider her ideas seriously, isn’t talking of a contentious issue, isn’t trying to convince readers one way or the other about it, isn’t one among a bunch of other similar characters who push the same agenda, and as if she isn’t in contact with those other characters, even having them on her blogroll. She shouldn’t try to dupe me into thinking that what she says has no potential effect on anyone, regarding issues that concern many.

Then she makes fun of me for having weak reading comprehension. If she likes to antagonize others based on their abilities, that completely disproves that she supposedly thinks impairments aren’t misfortunate or problematic. She of course, is trying to backtrack what she said to protect her reputation after I explained her for what she is. 
“I have never tried to argue that my students are not seriously impaired, or that language and communication are not important.” 
Bullshit!: “I’m not convinced that lacking language is the cruel blow it’s often thought of” Saying that belies that one thinks that language and communication are important. You can’t talk the way she does of things and not be one who undermines the understanding of how problematic severe impairment is. 
“Hardly. I am attempting to ascertain what, exactly, these “real professionals” are saying, and how that fits in with my experience.” She should read up on it and act like she has done so.

Then she pathetically tries to refute my slamming her for saying: “Intelligence, if it means anything to me, is a light, a brightness behind someone’s eyes, a spark thrown off by the working gears of their mind.”
with this: “What? No. No no no.
First of all, I am a homo homo sapiens, not vermin. But nice insult. It seems, to me, to signal the beginnings of ravings.
Secondly, I was, in the paragraph referenced, revering to common usages of the word “intelligence”. ” Nothing was cleared up to her credit. Just showing that she can’t handle my castigation or being called basically an asshole.

“This is not tantamount to calling my students gifted or nondisabled.” I know she wouldn’t just come out and say that, or simply try to convince others of exactly that. That doesn’t mean she’s not implicitly undermining the realization of how severe and devastating mental impairments are, through making sweeping statements using slight progress as examples. 
“Take anything out of context” The context excuse is getting really old.
“Said it was morally repugnant to write someone off, to say that they are sub-human because of their intellect.” No. Don’t pretend you said things you didn’t in an order you didn’t. Saying someone lacks intelligence isn’t the same as writing them off.

“I am more optimistic, more determined, than you. I see their futures differently. I don’t waste my time with horror and pity–I do something about it.” Optimistic about what? What goal? You aren’t determined to end the suffering. When have you asked them what they want you to be determined to do for them, how much they want in the long run? Where is their consent for you to see their futures in the way you do, and to talk of their futures in such a way? It’s no skin off your nose if all that would benefit them isn’t done.

“I see we have moved from personal attacks into sheer delusions. I am working to give these kids a self-determined life” The way you talk is detrimental to their self-determination. You don’t represent them. The euphemistic talk you throw in is degrading. How are you acting in accord with their own conscious efforts and wishes in their own interests?
“and even harder for them” At least this is truthful. I think the much harder work of them should be compensated with a future of independence and prosperity, that isn’t less than that of those who don’t have to work anywhere near as hard.
“So yeah, I’ll celebrate the small victories” Why do you do it the way you do?

Translation of above;
WAHHHH! Mummy! She won’t let me talk to her anymore! I want to talk to her! WAHHHH!

Julia is not talking nonsense, Cresp. She has experience even beyond my own, and has every right to call anyone who intentionally misrepresents her a troll. She also called Cresp’s original post a tantrum (which is partly the reason for my above translation). If anyone is pushing despotic BS, it’s Cresp. I mean heck – he won’t let her promote the positives calling it “blown out of proportion”. Oh sure, let’s say nothing and not get excited about a baby’s first steps then! Sheesh!

Cresp talked about reasoning – when he has none. He can’t because his so-called reason is poisoning by sheer hate. That is easily reflected in his over reaction to her rightful comment to not read what you don’t like. The point that Cresp completely missed is that most blog readers DO like what Julia says – because she is credible. That reflects on the blog roll. Duped indeed!

Weak reading comprehension is the correct call. I’ve called him on that several times – it’s his hate showing itself again. He only reads what he wants to read, and he intentionally twists what is said to his own advantage to push his hate riddled agenda. An agenda that – if implemented – will cost lives and many more tax payers dollars that would otherwise be needed. A person who pursues that is most certainly vermin. A great call by Julia. Cresp is making out severe impairments to be horrible and without redemption – which is completely false and psychologically destructive.

Cresp then questions the existence of goals. Now this is where Cresp’s hate comes to the fore. “Oh there can’t be any goals. The situation is utterly hopeless and can’t be changed!” RUBBISH! EVERY human being has a purpose in life, and the core one is to live. Everyone has that right – a right that Cresp effectively denies with this attitude. He advocates defeat. He advocates giving up and wallowing in the chasm of defeatism. Only a coward does that. Suffering ends with the efforts of people like Julia. The power of being positive and loving and showing these children that they are worth something – a factor absent in the psych of Billy Cresp. He has the ability to be independent – and won’t take it because he thinks he can’t.

He can. He just doesn’t want to because he is lazy and he is a coward to boot.

“BILLY CRESP” as LURKER wrote;
This girl named Julia or whatever her name is, over at almandite.wordpress.com, has been talking of her experiences working in Lifeskills helping out mentally disabled children, among other things she talks of in which she gives off a facade of emotionally fragile thinking. Recently, she’s been describing the slight progress a couple of the children that she works with have made, to try to basically prove that they and others aren’t really cognitively disabled and that language abilities aren’t necessary. 

She admits she’s rambling, yet expects to be seriously considered in her attempt to contradict what real professionals know and have proven about what intelligence is. Then this little vermin claims that intelligence is a brightness behind someone’s eyes and shit like that. Like we should just be delighted and heartwarmed when hearing a sweet, hysterically emotional statement such as that. Fuck that shit, and fuck her! Then she claims it’s morally repugnant to say someone lacks intelligence. Where does this hysterically senseless college prima donna get off talking such phony shit of those who have such bleak and limited futures? Nobody living prominently would dare be expected to go on in such a deprived status that would be the subject of such euphemistic bullshit!

She seems to just like her maternalisic relationship with the children she works with, who are out of any position to compete with her. I bet she likes the idea that there are some who wouldn’t have an easy time standing up to her. She can pat on the head those who she wants to perceive as helpless who she wants to remain helpless, and correspondingly pat herself on the back. I refuse to ignore the controlling mindset of hers. I hate that she doesn’t consider the contrast between her own fortuntate mental strength and the large lack thereof in those who she patronizes. She and others just love having what so many others don’t have, and keeping it for themselves. Someone who has a gifted IQ saying that intelligence isn’t important or even meaningful. Who does she think she’s fooling? I’d like to see this hog give up her IQ points and then say it’s alright to be cognitively disabled!

Apparently Cresp put a comment on the blog concerned and it was deleted – hence this deluded rant.

The reality is that Julia has more experience with children that have genuine cognitive issues than Cresp ever will, and that by itself is reason to at least give her the proverbial ear. But oh no – Cresp has to go down his stupid line about how bad being cognitively challenged is just to make himself look like the victim, when his challenges are self inflicted. The children she looks after will have something that Cresp will never have – an ability to love and accept. Cresp will never have that ability because he is consumed with hate, hence all this negativity. Hate for what? Hate for himself – for no good reason. And he refuses to admit that HE is the problem – because he has no issues that are outside his control.

Julia is to be congratulated for accepting cognition issues for what they are and helping those make the best fist of it that they can. Those under her care will be better for it than being left to wallow like what Cresp obviously wants them to do! But then what do you expect from a little boy called Billy Cresp who hasn’t got a positive bone in his entire body? I hope he’s telling the truth about the vocational help, because if they are on the ball – they’ll realise what’s going on as I have (amongst many others) and react accordingly. Either in the same way Julia has to her charges (which probably won’t work to be honest such is Cresp’s delusion level) or with plenty of metaphorical kicks to the rear end!

I’ve noticed that Cresp has had a whine to Best on Hating Autism, bemoaning Best’s supposed effort being given up upon. Here’s what he said;

I think I’m going to miss you. I’ve considered you a source of encouragement and support during those times when I’ve felt distraught by the vile attitudes of ND pushers.

All Cresp wants is justification. Justification for his negativity and consequent laziness and wallowing in self pity. He has to pull himself up and he’s got no excuse not to. Best’s attitude towards the concept of Neurodiversity gives that justification – or so Cresp thinks!

I’m not sure what kind of blogging I’ll be doing in the near future, partly as I’m not sure yet of who I can convince and what I can steer them towards.

Cresp is still not getting the message. He can’t convince anyone of anything he presently believes in because it is so inherently wrong. I can see it. So can Clay, Corina, Kim (Wombles) and everyone else who knows that Cresp is a threat to the truth. He shouldn’t be doing any blogging – at all.

I’ve tried to reason with the ND creeps many times, yet I now realize the futility of that in stopping the selfish ambitions of theirs. I’ll keep trying to expose reality to their propaganda.

You can’t handle reality, Cresp! Apologies to Jack Nicholson for the misquote. That’s your whole problem and you make excuses to cover for it – and people like me expose your lack of reality. Keep trying? Talking of futility….

I don’t know how long it will be before they are defeated.

Never. Fact never is.

I hope someday enough people stand up to their oppression and the pessimism they use.

LMAO! You oppress yourself, Cresp! No one else does that! And you are the most pessimistic person about at the moment.